Robert Dailey writes:
> I have more details about my inquiry on StackOverflow:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22823768/view-git-log-with-merges-for-only-certain-branches
>
> Basically I'd like to know if it is possible to show the graph for
> ONLY branches that I list. The key here is that
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Matthieu Moy
wrote:
> Robert Dailey writes:
>
>> I have more details about my inquiry on StackOverflow:
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22823768/view-git-log-with-merges-for-only-certain-branches
>>
>> Basically I'd like to know if it is possible to show the
On Tue, Apr 08 2014, Robert Dailey wrote:
> I have more details about my inquiry on StackOverflow:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22823768/view-git-log-with-merges-for-only-certain-branches
>
> Basically I'd like to know if it is possible to show the graph for
> ONLY branches that I list. The
Robert Dailey writes:
> I have more details about my inquiry on StackOverflow:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22823768/view-git-log-with-merges-for-only-certain-branches
>
> Basically I'd like to know if it is possible to show the graph for
> ONLY branches that I list.
Not sure it'll direc
I have more details about my inquiry on StackOverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22823768/view-git-log-with-merges-for-only-certain-branches
Basically I'd like to know if it is possible to show the graph for
ONLY branches that I list. The key here is that the graph should also
show relati
5 matches
Mail list logo