Jonathan,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Actually, 'git grep -h' tells me that git grep --name-only is already
> accepted as a synonym for --files-with-matches, ever since
You are absolutely right, it was a typo (and then not RTFM the
resulting help) on my part that ca
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:10:33PM -0600, Woody Gilk wrote:
> git diff --name-only
> git grep --files-with-matches
>
> I think --files-with-matches should be deprecated and replaced with
> --name-only for consistency.
git grep supports both: --name-only for consistency with other git
commands, an
Hi Woody,
Woody Gilk wrote:
> git diff --name-only
> git grep --files-with-matches
>
> I think --files-with-matches should be deprecated and replaced with
> --name-only for consistency.
See the (non-git) diff(1) and grep(1) manpages.
It might make sense for 'git grep' to learn --name-only too a
Woody Gilk writes:
> git diff --name-only
> git grep --files-with-matches
>
> I think --files-with-matches should be deprecated and replaced with
> --name-only for consistency.
That longer name comes from "GNU grep" consistency.
Why anybody does not use a shorter and sweeter "grep -l" is beyond
git diff --name-only
git grep --files-with-matches
I think --files-with-matches should be deprecated and replaced with
--name-only for consistency.
Thanks,
--
Woody Gilk
http://about.me/shadowhand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord
5 matches
Mail list logo