Re: git commit (or git-commit-script) question

2005-08-19 Thread Junio C Hamano
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, one thing to look out for is that if you've marked any files for > update (with git-update-cache) those will always be committed regardless > of what arguments you give to "git commit". Another thing to look out for is that the files you tol

Re: git commit (or git-commit-script) question

2005-08-19 Thread Johnny Stenback
Ah, that explains it. I had already marked all my changes for update, that's what threw me off here. Thanks! Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Johnny Stenback wrote: That made me assume that if I do: git-commit-script somedir it would *only* commit the changes I've made in "some

Re: git commit (or git-commit-script) question

2005-08-19 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Johnny Stenback wrote: > > That made me assume that if I do: > >git-commit-script somedir > > it would *only* commit the changes I've made in "somedir", but it > appears to commit *all* files that have changed (and shows all files in > the list of changed files in th

git commit (or git-commit-script) question

2005-08-19 Thread Johnny Stenback
Hey all, git-commit-script --help says: git commit [-a] [-m ] [-F ] [(-C|-c) ] [...] That made me assume that if I do: git-commit-script somedir it would *only* commit the changes I've made in "somedir", but it appears to commit *all* files that have changed (and shows all files in the