Re: git blame vs git log --follow performance

2014-01-26 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > Is there something that can be done about improving > git log --follow -- performance to be nearly > equivalent speed to git blame -- ? Not strictly about --follow, but there is room for improvement for diff'ing in log in general. Right now

Re: git blame vs git log --follow performance

2014-01-26 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 08:33 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > For instance (using the Linus' linux kernel git): > > > > $ time git log --follow -- drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig > /dev/null > > > > real0m42.329s > > user0m40.984s > > sys

Re: git blame vs git log --follow performance

2014-01-26 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > For instance (using the Linus' linux kernel git): > > $ time git log --follow -- drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig > /dev/null > > real0m42.329s > user0m40.984s > sys 0m0.792s > > $ time git blame -- drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig >

git blame vs git log --follow performance

2014-01-26 Thread Joe Perches
Hi. Is there something that can be done about improving git log --follow -- performance to be nearly equivalent speed to git blame -- ? The overall cpu time taken for these 2 commands that track individual file history can be quite different. git log --follow -- and git blame