Re: git blame --follow

2012-09-06 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:12:42PM +0200, norbert.nemec wrote: > The option should either be rejected or do *something* documented and > useful. Ideally, it should result in behavior that matches 'git log > --follow' as closely as possible. So maybe, it should be a synonym > for a certain number o

Re: git blame --follow

2012-09-06 Thread norbert.nemec
ing: On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:02:17AM +0200, norbert.nemec wrote: 'git blame --follow' seems to be undocumented. The exact behavior is not clear to me. Perhaps an alias for some combination of '-C' and '-M'? It seems not be be fully consistent with 'git log

Re: git blame --follow

2012-09-06 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:02:17AM +0200, norbert.nemec wrote: > 'git blame --follow' seems to be undocumented. The exact behavior is > not clear to me. Perhaps an alias for some combination of '-C' and > '-M'? It seems not be be fully consistent with

git blame --follow

2012-09-06 Thread norbert.nemec
Hi there, 'git blame --follow' seems to be undocumented. The exact behavior is not clear to me. Perhaps an alias for some combination of '-C' and '-M'? It seems not be be fully consistent with 'git log --follow'. Could someone clarify? Did I mi