Joe Perches writes:
> On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 11:17 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Joe Perches writes:
>>
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 10:41 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Maybe something like traces or chains.
>> > Or "taggers" or "tagged-bys"
>> I am afraid that you are way too l
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 11:17 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Joe Perches writes:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 10:41 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe something like traces or chains.
> > Or "taggers" or "tagged-bys"
> I am afraid that you are way too late; the ship has already sailed
Joe Perches writes:
> On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 10:41 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Maybe something like traces or chains.
>
> Or "taggers" or "tagged-bys"
I am afraid that you are way too late; the ship has already sailed a
few years ago, if not earlier, I think.
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 10:41 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Maybe something like traces or chains.
Or "taggers" or "tagged-bys"
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 10:34 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Joe Perches writes:
> > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 09:54 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > >
> > > Support for more generic footers was supposed to come when the
> > > "interpret-trailers" topic started, but the author of the topic
> > > seems
Joe Perches writes:
> On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 09:54 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Support for more generic footers was supposed to come when the
>> "interpret-trailers" topic started, but the author of the topic
>> seems to have lost interest before the mechanism has become ready to
>> be integra
Joe Perches writes:
> (adding lkml)
>
> On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 09:54 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Joe Perches writes:
>> > git-am -s will avoid duplicating the last signature
>> > in a patch.
>> >
>> > But given a developer creates a patch, send it around for
>> > acks/other signoffs, collect
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 09:54 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Support for more generic footers was supposed to come when the
> "interpret-trailers" topic started, but the author of the topic
> seems to have lost interest before the mechanism has become ready to
> be integrated in the workflow commands
(adding lkml)
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 09:54 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Joe Perches writes:
> > git-am -s will avoid duplicating the last signature
> > in a patch.
> >
> > But given a developer creates a patch, send it around for
> > acks/other signoffs, collects signatures and then does
> > a
Joe Perches writes:
> git-am -s will avoid duplicating the last signature
> in a patch.
>
> But given a developer creates a patch, send it around for
> acks/other signoffs, collects signatures and then does
> a git am -s on a different branch, this sort of sign-off
> chain is possible:
>
>
git-am -s will avoid duplicating the last signature
in a patch.
But given a developer creates a patch, send it around for
acks/other signoffs, collects signatures and then does
a git am -s on a different branch, this sort of sign-off
chain is possible:
Signed-off-by: Original Developer
11 matches
Mail list logo
