On 29 July 2016 at 00:38, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Øyvind A. Holm writes:
> > Jakub Narębski wrote:
> > > I wonder if using `git worktree` instead of `git clone` (well,
> > > local clone uses hardlinks, so it is not that costly as it looks
> > > like) would be a better solution.
> >
> > That's an
On 28 July 2016 at 21:31, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 2016-07-28 o 18:56, Øyvind A. Holm pisze:
> > Øyvind A. Holm writes:
> > > This is a script I created some weeks ago, and I've found it to be
> > > immensely useful. Here is a snippet from git-testadd --help:
> > > [...]
> > > This script
W dniu 2016-07-28 o 18:56, Øyvind A. Holm pisze:
> On 28 July 2016 at 18:37, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Øyvind A. Holm writes:
>>> This is a script I created some weeks ago, and I've found it to be
>>> immensely useful. Here is a snippet from git-testadd --help:
>>>
>>> If you have lots of unrel
On 28 July 2016 at 18:37, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Øyvind A. Holm writes:
> > This is a script I created some weeks ago, and I've found it to be
> > immensely useful. Here is a snippet from git-testadd --help:
> >
> > If you have lots of unrelated uncommitted changes in the current
> > reposit
This is a script I created some weeks ago, and I've found it to be
immensely useful. Here is a snippet from git-testadd --help:
If you have lots of unrelated uncommitted changes in the current
repository and want to split up the commit, how can you easily check
if the changes passes the test
5 matches
Mail list logo
