Re: git-log on a file, and merges

2019-08-03 Thread Piotr Krukowiecki
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:32 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Piotr Krukowiecki writes: > > > At this moment I'm not sure myself if I consider this a bug or not. > > This definitely is not a bug but is a designed and intended > behaviour. (generally speaking) By "bug" I mean wrong behaviour. Designs

Re: git-log on a file, and merges

2019-08-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Piotr Krukowiecki writes: > At this moment I'm not sure myself if I consider this a bug or not. This definitely is not a bug but is a designed and intended behaviour. Think of running "git log" without "--full-history" that is limited with a pathspec as a tool to ask Git to show _one_ way (pref

Re: git-log on a file, and merges

2019-08-02 Thread Piotr Krukowiecki
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:22 PM Derrick Stolee wrote: > > On 8/2/2019 5:38 AM, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have merged a branch into master. > > > > When on master I do "git log -- some/file", it does not show commits > > from merged branch (which I know they changed the file). > > I

Re: git-log on a file, and merges

2019-08-02 Thread Derrick Stolee
On 8/2/2019 5:38 AM, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: > Hi, > > I have merged a branch into master. > > When on master I do "git log -- some/file", it does not show commits > from merged branch (which I know they changed the file). > I have to add "--full-history" to see the commits. > When I run "git lo

git-log on a file, and merges

2019-08-02 Thread Piotr Krukowiecki
Hi, I have merged a branch into master. When on master I do "git log -- some/file", it does not show commits from merged branch (which I know they changed the file). I have to add "--full-history" to see the commits. When I run "git log" (without "-- some/file") I can see the commits without usin