Re: [PATCH] Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-12 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes, but cg-clone doesn't - it naively depended on the core git tools > >> actually, er.. working. ;-) > > Sorry about that. I used to have a wrapper to de

Re: [PATCH] Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes, but cg-clone doesn't - it naively depended on the core git tools >> actually, er.. working. ;-) Sorry about that. I used to have a wrapper to deal with packs around http-pull before Daniel's pack enhanc

[PATCH] Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-11 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:21:46AM CEST, I got a letter > where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > $ git-cat-file commit bf570303153902ec3d85570ed24515bcf8948848 | grep tree

Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:21:46AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > $ git-cat-file commit bf570303153902ec3d85570ed24515bcf8948848 | grep tree > > tree 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45

Re: [PATCH] Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-11 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It should work anyway,... > > That is true. Please forget about the "recommendation" to slurp > packs and not falling back on commit walker. > > Thanks for the patch. No problem; I had been wonderin

Re: [PATCH] Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It should work anyway,... That is true. Please forget about the "recommendation" to slurp packs and not falling back on commit walker. Thanks for the patch. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message t

Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Last time I checked, git-http-pull did not utilize the pack > dependency information, which indeed is wrong. When it decides > to fetch a pack instead of an asked-for object, it should check > which commits the pack expects to have in your local reposi

[PATCH] Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-11 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > $ git-cat-file commit bf570303153902ec3d85570ed24515bcf8948848 | grep tree > > tree 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45 > > $ git-read-tree 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45 > > fatal: failed to

Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > $ git-cat-file commit bf570303153902ec3d85570ed24515bcf8948848 | grep tree > tree 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45 > $ git-read-tree 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce96f45 > fatal: failed to unpack tree object 41f10531f1799bbb31a1e0f7652363154ce9

git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:06:10PM CEST, I got a letter where Dirk Behme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Hello, Hello, > >cg-clone http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git > defaulting to local storage area > warning: templates not found /home/user/share/git-core/templates/ >