On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 09:31:46PM +, Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US) wrote:
> > That would work for the message-ID, but not for the various To: and Cc:
> > addresses.
> >
> > The hacky script that I sent afterwards produces a string with the
>
> Nit, it does not make use of the reply-to header if
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Oosthoek
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 4:08 PM
>
> * Junio C Hamano [2012-12-26 12:35:28 -0800]:
> > >
> > > Anyway, I could imagine this as optional flag of git format-patch,
> so you could say:
> > > $ git format-patch -s --in-reply-to-email a7
* Junio C Hamano [2012-12-26 12:35:28 -0800]:
> >
> > Anyway, I could imagine this as optional flag of git format-patch, so you
> > could say:
> > $ git format-patch -s --in-reply-to-email a7fe7de8
> >
> > But I'll save that as an exercise for the reader (or the future)
>
> I think a much more
Simon Oosthoek writes:
> Hi all
>
> I've been very frustrated by the process to setup a commandline for git
> format-patch, to include everyone in the cc list and reply to the right
> message-id.
>
> In my frustration I created a perl script to generate the options from a
> saved e-mail, I rea
Hi all
I've been very frustrated by the process to setup a commandline for git
format-patch, to include everyone in the cc list and reply to the right
message-id.
In my frustration I created a perl script to generate the options from a saved
e-mail, I realise that it may be non-general and per
Hi all
I've been very frustrated by the process to setup a commandline for git
format-patch, to include everyone in the cc list and reply to the right
message-id.
In my frustration I created a perl script to generate the options from a saved
e-mail, I realise that it may be non-general and per
6 matches
Mail list logo
