On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:30:57AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> Something like this seems to fix it for me, but I am not sure if that
> would affect other callers.
> [...]
> + return !is_dir || !S_ISGITLINK(istate->cache[pos]->ce_mode);
That's completely wrong, of course. It should be:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:05:05AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > however (what got me started wondering about this and a point i forgot
> > about) - t2/one/test doesn't show up under 'untracked files' in in
> > status that scenario. shouldn't it?
>
> Yes, I think that is a bug.
>
> My guess is tha
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:22:04PM +, shawn wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Andreas Schwab
> wrote:
> > shawn wilson writes:
> >
> >> and once it's added, status says:
> >> # renamed:t2 -> t2/one/test
> >>
> >> that's not exactly true, but...
> >
> > What's wrong
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> shawn wilson writes:
>
>> and once it's added, status says:
>> # renamed:t2 -> t2/one/test
>>
>> that's not exactly true, but...
>
> What's wrong with it? Both files have the same contents, which is the
> link target for symlink
shawn wilson writes:
> and once it's added, status says:
> # renamed:t2 -> t2/one/test
>
> that's not exactly true, but...
What's wrong with it? Both files have the same contents, which is the
link target for symlinks.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key finge
shawn wilson writes:
> why is this different?
You didn't tell git about t2/one/test. You need to add it first to make
it known.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely differe
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> shawn wilson writes:
>
>> but should t2 be reported as 'deleted'?
>
> Sure, that's what you did.
>
if i do the same to a file (same repo):
touch test2
git add test2
git commit test2 -m "test2"
rm test
ln -s test2 test
git status
# On b
shawn wilson writes:
> but should t2 be reported as 'deleted'?
Sure, that's what you did.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> shawn wilson writes:
>> % git status
>> # On branch master
>> # Changes not staged for commit:
>> # (use "git add/rm ..." to update what will be committed)
>> # (use "git checkout -- ..." to discard changes in working directory)
>> #
shawn wilson writes:
> i'm curious why this is being reported as deleted in status and diff
> and not modified? this was tested on a build of the master branch of
> the current git repo (1.8.0).
>
> mkdir t cd t; git --init
>
> touch test
> git add test
> git commit test -m "test"
>
> ln -s test
10 matches
Mail list logo
