Junio C Hamano writes:
> You can define values to optional negatives and optional positives to
> express a more
> elaborate sort order e.g.
>
> 1.0-pre12 < 1.0-rc0 < 1.0 < 1.0-post1
>
> even though "-post" does not have to be declared as optional positive.
... that is, you say "-pre" is a more
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>> My idea is to make it easy for the user to change the sort algorithm.
>>> And it's probably intuitive to just substitute a st
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> My idea is to make it easy for the user to change the sort algorithm.
>> And it's probably intuitive to just substitute a string with
>> something. So if "1-rc1" is put incorrectly b
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> My idea is to make it easy for the user to change the sort algorithm.
> And it's probably intuitive to just substitute a string with
> something. So if "1-rc1" is put incorrectly before "1.1" and you
> realize that "1.999" ought to be the last
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:26:29AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>
> >> There is debian bug 777690 [1] that's basically about making tag's
> >> version sort aware about -rc, -pre suffixes. I imagine it would touch
> >> versioncmp.c and builtin/t
5 matches
Mail list logo
