On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Paul Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:21 AM, David Michael Barr wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Paul Campbell wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Kindjal wrote:
David Michael Barr rr-dav.id.au> writes:
> From a quick sur
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:21 AM, David Michael Barr wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Paul Campbell wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Kindjal wrote:
>>> David Michael Barr rr-dav.id.au> writes:
>>>
From a quick survey, it appears there are no more than 55 patches
squash
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Paul Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Kindjal wrote:
>> David Michael Barr rr-dav.id.au> writes:
>>
>>> From a quick survey, it appears there are no more than 55 patches
>>> squashed into the submitted patch.
>>> As I have an interest in git-subtr
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Kindjal wrote:
> David Michael Barr rr-dav.id.au> writes:
>
>> From a quick survey, it appears there are no more than 55 patches
>> squashed into the submitted patch.
>> As I have an interest in git-subtree for maintaining the out-of-tree
>> version of vcs-svn/ and
David Michael Barr rr-dav.id.au> writes:
> From a quick survey, it appears there are no more than 55 patches
> squashed into the submitted patch.
> As I have an interest in git-subtree for maintaining the out-of-tree
> version of vcs-svn/ and a desire to improve my rebase-fu, I am tempted
> to m
David Michael Barr writes:
> As I have an interest in git-subtree for maintaining the out-of-tree
> version of vcs-svn/ and a desire to improve my rebase-fu, I am tempted
> to make some sense of the organic growth that happened on GitHub.
> It doesn't appear that anyone else is willing to do this
Herman van Rink writes:
> What would a random user have to do to get a patch in? I've found a
> number of subtree related mails on the git-user list go completely
> unanswerd. Amongst them a patch from James Nylen wich seems very
> reasonable.
I have those patches queued for merging. I've been
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:58 AM, David Michael Barr wrote:
> From a quick survey, it appears there are no more than 55 patches
> squashed into the submitted patch.
> As I have an interest in git-subtree for maintaining the out-of-tree
> version of vcs-svn/ and a desire to improve my rebase-fu, I a
On Saturday, 27 October 2012 at 12:10 AM, Herman van Rink wrote:
> On 10/22/2012 04:41 PM, d...@cray.com (mailto:d...@cray.com) wrote:
> > Herman van Rink mailto:r...@initfour.nl)> writes:
> >
> > > On 10/21/2012 08:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > > Herman van Rink mailto:r...@initfour.nl)> wri
On 10/22/2012 04:41 PM, d...@cray.com wrote:
> Herman van Rink writes:
>
>> On 10/21/2012 08:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Herman van Rink writes:
>>>
Junio, Could you please consider merging the single commit from my
subtree-updates branch? https://github.com/helmo/git/tree/subtree-
Herman van Rink writes:
> The problem is that I don't have the time to split all these out. Dag
> has indicated that he does not have the time either.
I would have the time to review and integrate separate patches. I do
not have time to unwrap the ball of wax and ensure the quality of each
feat
Junio C Hamano writes:
> I haven't formed an opinion on the particular change as to how bad
> its collapsing unrelated changes into a single change is. Maybe they
> are not as unrelated and form a coherent whole. Maybe not.
It is difficult for me to tell which is one of the red flags that cau
Herman van Rink writes:
> On 10/21/2012 08:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Herman van Rink writes:
>>
>>> Junio, Could you please consider merging the single commit from my
>>> subtree-updates branch? https://github.com/helmo/git/tree/subtree-updates
>> In general, in areas like contrib/ where t
On 10/21/2012 09:51 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Herman van Rink writes:
>
>> On 10/21/2012 08:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Herman van Rink writes:
>>>
Junio, Could you please consider merging the single commit from my
subtree-updates branch? https://github.com/helmo/git/tree/subtree
Herman van Rink writes:
> On 10/21/2012 08:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Herman van Rink writes:
>>
>>> Junio, Could you please consider merging the single commit from my
>>> subtree-updates branch? https://github.com/helmo/git/tree/subtree-updates
>> In general, in areas like contrib/ where t
On 10/21/2012 08:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Herman van Rink writes:
>
>> Junio, Could you please consider merging the single commit from my
>> subtree-updates branch? https://github.com/helmo/git/tree/subtree-updates
> In general, in areas like contrib/ where there is a volunteer area
> mainta
Herman van Rink writes:
> Junio, Could you please consider merging the single commit from my
> subtree-updates branch? https://github.com/helmo/git/tree/subtree-updates
In general, in areas like contrib/ where there is a volunteer area
maintainer, unless the change something ultra-urgent (e.g. s
On 07/11/2012 06:14 PM, d...@cray.com wrote:
> Herman van Rink writes:
>
>>> It's hard to tell what's what with one big diff. Each command should
>>> get its own commit plus more if infrastructure work has to be done. I
>>> realize it's a bit of a pain to reformulate this but git rebase -i makes
Herman van Rink writes:
>> It's hard to tell what's what with one big diff. Each command should
>> get its own commit plus more if infrastructure work has to be done. I
>> realize it's a bit of a pain to reformulate this but git rebase -i makes
>> it easy and the history will be much better lon
19 matches
Mail list logo
