Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] multi-pack-index: add --no-progress

2019-09-20 Thread William Baker
On 9/20/19 1:23 PM, Philip Oakley wrote: > These subject lines are a bit long. Has there been some white space damage > during preparation, such that the end of line, and following blank line, for > a short subject line been compromised? > > Normally the 'git log --oneline' should fit within th

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] multi-pack-index: add --no-progress

2019-09-20 Thread William Baker
On 9/20/19 12:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Do all of these commits have overly long title with no body recorded > in the commit objects, or is this just a mail sending program > screwing up? > Sorry about that! With some help from Stolee I found the issue was that I was missing a second lin

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] multi-pack-index: add --no-progress

2019-09-20 Thread Philip Oakley
Hi William, welcome. On 20/09/2019 17:53, William Baker via GitGitGadget wrote: Hello Git contributors! My name is William Baker and I work at Microsoft. Over the past few years I've worked closely with the Microsoft team contributing to the git ecosystem and I'm excited to start working with t

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] multi-pack-index: add --no-progress

2019-09-20 Thread Junio C Hamano
"William Baker via GitGitGadget" writes: > William Baker (6): > midx: add MIDX_PROGRESS flag Add the MIDX_PROGRESS flag and update the > write|verify|expire|repack functions in midx.h to accept a flags > parameter. The MIDX_PROGRESS flag indicates whether the caller of > the functi