On 17/10/19 07:08AM, Birger Skogeng Pedersen wrote:
> Hi Pratyush,
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:28 PM Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > I mentioned this earlier, and I'll mention this again: I'm not sure
> > whether this feature would be a good thing for the larger population. So
> > this _might_ not en
Hi Johannes,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 7:33 AM Johannes Sixt wrote:
> FWIW, I would prefer to experiment with the feature for a few weeks
> before it (or a configuration that enables it by default) is baked in.
Yes please do. Obviously I'm glad someone other than me will be
actually testing it.
(A
Am 17.10.19 um 07:08 schrieb Birger Skogeng Pedersen:
> Hi Pratyush,
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:28 PM Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> I mentioned this earlier, and I'll mention this again: I'm not sure
>> whether this feature would be a good thing for the larger population. So
>> this _might_ not end
Hi Pratyush,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:28 PM Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> I mentioned this earlier, and I'll mention this again: I'm not sure
> whether this feature would be a good thing for the larger population. So
> this _might_ not end up being accepted depending on how people react to
> the propo
On 15/10/19 12:51PM, Birger Skogeng Pedersen wrote:
> Hi Pratyush,
>
> Thanks for reviewing. How does this work, do I send a re-roll of the
> patch(es)?
Yes, please do.
I mentioned this earlier, and I'll mention this again: I'm not sure
whether this feature would be a good thing for the larger
Hi Pratyush,
Thanks for reviewing. How does this work, do I send a re-roll of the patch(es)?
Birger
Hi Birger,
Your subject is a bit redundant. A reader of this commit can easily see
the diff and know that you implemented "proc select_path_in_widget".
What's more important is why you implemented it. That is what should go
in the commit message. So for example in this patch, you can say
somet
7 matches
Mail list logo