On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:06:51PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:06:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Neil Horman writes:
> >
> > > I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support
> > > multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:06:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Neil Horman writes:
>
> > I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support
> > multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how
> > best to
> > do it The thoughts I had were:
Neil Horman writes:
> I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support
> multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how best
> to
> do it The thoughts I had were:
>
> 1) A per branch sequence directory...
> 2) Augment the git-stash comma
Hey-
I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support
multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how best to
do it. The use case is primarily for cherry-pick - i.e. I often have need to
cherry pick a large set of commits to an older kernel,
4 matches
Mail list logo
