Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Thomas Ackermann"
>> (5) Large overlapping with the tutorials. IMHO all of the
>> tutorials should be blended into user-manual
[...]
> I would be a little cautious of your point 5 if it squoze everything into
> one overlong document at the expense of losing the short
> > (1) Very poor html formatting (document type "book" causes
> > ugly TOCs per section and there's a "Part I" without a "Part II")
> > (2) Partly outdated content
> > (3) Sub-optimal structuring (to-do list as part of the document,
> > glossary not at the end of the document)
> > (4) User-manua
From: "Thomas Ackermann"
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 8:48 AM
W. Trevor King tremily.us> writes:
I'm also surprised that I couldn't find a more obvious link to the
manual from git-scm.com (I ended up taking a “See Also” link from
gittutorial(7) [3]). I'm not sure if this is intentional or n
W. Trevor King tremily.us> writes:
>
> I'm also surprised that I couldn't find a more obvious link to the
> manual from git-scm.com (I ended up taking a “See Also” link from
> gittutorial(7) [3]). I'm not sure if this is intentional or not,
> since git-scm.com does prominently link Pro Git, and
I went to reference some `rebase -i` discussion that landed in 3ca26e8
(Merge branch 'wk/user-manual', 2013-02-25), and I couldn't find a
version of the manual online that contained the new content. There's
a version on kernel.org [1], but that doesn't seem to have been
updated since February. Th
5 matches
Mail list logo
