Re: Minor correction to Git book

2013-05-08 Thread John Keeping
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:01:00PM +0100, Robin Messer wrote: > > I think the text is correct as it stands. "git status" shows you that > > there are changes that are staged and unstaged, "git diff" (and "git > > diff --cached") shows you what those changes are. > > Thanks, but the command line w

RE: Minor correction to Git book

2013-05-08 Thread Robin Messer
> I think the text is correct as it stands. "git status" shows you that > there are changes that are staged and unstaged, "git diff" (and "git > diff --cached") shows you what those changes are. Thanks, but the command line which follows that text does actually use "git status" to show which file

Re: Minor correction to Git book

2013-05-08 Thread John Keeping
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:24:56AM +0100, Robin Messer wrote: > I'm just learning Git so I don't yet know how to submit this > as a patch, but I'm reading the Git Book to get myself started > and I think there is a mistake on the page at: > > http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Basics-Recording-Changes

Minor correction to Git book

2013-05-08 Thread Robin Messer
I'm just learning Git so I don't yet know how to submit this as a patch, but I'm reading the Git Book to get myself started and I think there is a mistake on the page at: http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Basics-Recording-Changes-to-the-Repository It says: "For another example, if you stage the benc