On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:01:00PM +0100, Robin Messer wrote:
> > I think the text is correct as it stands. "git status" shows you that
> > there are changes that are staged and unstaged, "git diff" (and "git
> > diff --cached") shows you what those changes are.
>
> Thanks, but the command line w
> I think the text is correct as it stands. "git status" shows you that
> there are changes that are staged and unstaged, "git diff" (and "git
> diff --cached") shows you what those changes are.
Thanks, but the command line which follows that text does actually use
"git status" to show which file
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:24:56AM +0100, Robin Messer wrote:
> I'm just learning Git so I don't yet know how to submit this
> as a patch, but I'm reading the Git Book to get myself started
> and I think there is a mistake on the page at:
>
> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Basics-Recording-Changes
I'm just learning Git so I don't yet know how to submit this
as a patch, but I'm reading the Git Book to get myself started
and I think there is a mistake on the page at:
http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Basics-Recording-Changes-to-the-Repository
It says: "For another example, if you stage the benc
4 matches
Mail list logo