On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:24:47 +0200
Samuel Åslund wrote:
[...]
> >> One feature with "git branch xyz" and "git checkout xyz" that is
> >> rather obvious if you know them but bit me a little since I did
> >> not, is that uncommitted work in progress is not affected or saved
> >> when switching betw
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Samuel Åslund wrote:
> On 17/4/10 12:21, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Samuel Åslund
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I just started playing around with branching in git.
>>> I have been using it more or less as Subversion
On 17/4/10 12:21, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Samuel Åslund wrote:
Hi all.
I just started playing around with branching in git.
I have been using it more or less as Subversion until now.
One feature with "git branch xyz" and "git checkout xyz" that is rathe
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Samuel Åslund wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I just started playing around with branching in git.
> I have been using it more or less as Subversion until now.
>
> One feature with "git branch xyz" and "git checkout xyz" that is rather
> obvious if you know them but bit me a
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:56:30 +0200
Samuel Åslund wrote:
> I just started playing around with branching in git.
> I have been using it more or less as Subversion until now.
>
> One feature with "git branch xyz" and "git checkout xyz" that is
> rather obvious if you know them but bit me a little s
Hi all.
I just started playing around with branching in git.
I have been using it more or less as Subversion until now.
One feature with "git branch xyz" and "git checkout xyz" that is rather
obvious if you know them but bit me a little since I did not, is that
uncommitted work in progress is
6 matches
Mail list logo
