On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 01:37:54AM -0700, Yi EungJun wrote:
> > - Written policy: https://git-scm.com/trademark
>
> My browser shows an "Untrusted Connection" page when click the link.
>
> Does git-scm have no TLS certificate?
Hmm, you're right. It has a *.herokuapp.com cert. That's fine for
h
> - Written policy: https://git-scm.com/trademark
My browser shows an "Untrusted Connection" page when click the link.
Does git-scm have no TLS certificate?
--
View this message in context:
http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/Git-SFC-Status-Update-tp7628669p7628850.html
Sent
Jeff King writes:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:30:23PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > If I recall correctly, Scott said onstage that some/all of the
>> > conference proceeds would be going directly into this fund. So this
>> > might need to be revised upward by 50-100% sometime soon :)
>>
>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:30:23PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > If I recall correctly, Scott said onstage that some/all of the
>> > conference proceeds would be going directly into this fund. So this
>> > might need to be revised upward by
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:30:23PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > If I recall correctly, Scott said onstage that some/all of the
> > conference proceeds would be going directly into this fund. So this
> > might need to be revised upward by 50-100% sometime soon :)
>
> I think you misheard it.
Dave Borowitz writes:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> # Money: How much do we have?
>>
>> - $19,059.25 (USD)
>>
>> // Disclaimer: this is not necessarily up-to-the-minute, as
>> // SFC's reports to us sometimes lag a bit. And also because
>> // I am fairly inexperienced u
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> # Money: How much do we have?
>
> - $19,059.25 (USD)
>
> // Disclaimer: this is not necessarily up-to-the-minute, as
> // SFC's reports to us sometimes lag a bit. And also because
> // I am fairly inexperienced using the `ledger` program, so
> /
Thanks for the report, and thanks to everyone on the committee (and the
conservancy).
I'm somewhat disappointed to see that violent revolutions are excluded,
though ;)
Seriously, keeping the scope of "The Git Project" (the SCF member) as
limited as it is seems to be the best approach to keeping i
Here are the slides from my talk at Git Merge, along with the speaker
notes and a few tidbits from the discussion that came afterwards. The
talk was not recorded, so if you were there, please feel free to fill in
details I've missed from the ensuing discussion.
I'm sending the source format, since
9 matches
Mail list logo
