Re: Fwd: Uninit'ed submodules

2013-05-07 Thread Chris Packham
On 07/05/13 07:16, Jens Lehmann wrote: > Am 06.05.2013 02:19, schrieb Chris Packham: >> This did get me thinking. Why does an uninitialized submodule need to >> have an empty directory? If it didn't the maintainer in question >> probably would have realized that he needed to run "git submodule >> u

Re: Fwd: Uninit'ed submodules

2013-05-06 Thread Jens Lehmann
Am 06.05.2013 02:19, schrieb Chris Packham: > This did get me thinking. Why does an uninitialized submodule need to > have an empty directory? If it didn't the maintainer in question > probably would have realized that he needed to run "git submodule > update --init" when his "cd submodule" command

Fwd: Uninit'ed submodules

2013-05-05 Thread Chris Packham
Hi, [Jens, sorry for the re-send - trying to convince gmail to send plain text.] Just ran into a submodules usability situation at $dayjob that might be worth looking at. An internal maintainer was going to pull changes in from a project team into our repository which is arranged into submodules