Re: Fetch on submodule update

x27;t aware that `submodule update` >> did a fetch, because sometimes if I do that, I get errors saying SHA1 >> is not present (because the submodule did not get fetched). Granted I >> haven't seen this in a while, so maybe the fetch on submodule update >> is a newer fe

Re: Fetch on submodule update

do that, I get errors saying SHA1 > is not present (because the submodule did not get fetched). Granted I > haven't seen this in a while, so maybe the fetch on submodule update > is a newer feature. Do you know what triggers the fetch on update > without --remote? Is it the missing SHA

Re: Fetch on submodule update

update` did a fetch, because sometimes if I do that, I get errors saying SHA1 is not present (because the submodule did not get fetched). Granted I haven't seen this in a while, so maybe the fetch on submodule update is a newer feature. Do you know what triggers the fetch on update without --re

Re: Fetch on submodule update

Hi again, Robert Dailey wrote: > Problem: I want to avoid recursively fetching submodules when I run a > `fetch` command, and instead defer that operation to the next > `submodule update`. Essentially I want `fetch.recurseSubmodules` to be > `false`, and `get submodule update` to do exactly what

Re: Fetch on submodule update

Hi, Robert Dailey wrote: > Problem: I want to avoid recursively fetching submodules when I run a > `fetch` command, and instead defer that operation to the next > `submodule update`. Essentially I want `fetch.recurseSubmodules` to be > `false`, and `get submodule update` to do exactly what it doe

Fetch on submodule update

Problem: I want to avoid recursively fetching submodules when I run a `fetch` command, and instead defer that operation to the next `submodule update`. Essentially I want `fetch.recurseSubmodules` to be `false`, and `get submodule update` to do exactly what it does with the `--remote` option, but s