On Mar 13, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> May we have your sign-off? (See Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> section "Sign your work" for what this means.
I could have found that myself .. thanks! I'll try to follow it
now. :)
I'll resend the patch. Hopefully I'll do it right.
> Would it make sense to
Jeff King writes:
> Hmph. We ran into this before and fixed all of the sites (e.g., d1c3b10
> and 938791c). This one appears to have been added a few months later
> (by 68d5d03).
>
>> Maybe there are more places where it would be more robust to use
>> printf instead of echo.
>
> FWIW, I just look
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 01:02:13AM +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> When your system shell (/bin/sh) is a dash control sequences in
> strings get interpreted by the echo command. A commit message
> which ends with the string '\n' may result in a garbage line in
> the todo list of an interactive rebase
Hi,
Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> To reproduce the behavior (with dash as /bin/sh):
>
> mkdir test && cd test && git init
> echo 1 >foo && git add foo
> git commit -m"this commit message ends with '\n'"
> echo 2 >foo && git commit -a --fixup HEAD
> git rebase -i --autosquash --root
>
> Now the
Hi
When your system shell (/bin/sh) is a dash control sequences in
strings get interpreted by the echo command. A commit message
which ends with the string '\n' may result in a garbage line in
the todo list of an interactive rebase which causes the rebase
to fail.
To reproduce the behavior (with
5 matches
Mail list logo