Michael Campbell wrote:
> My company is moving from CVS to git in a few weeks (and we have a
> training class scheduled with the github folks).
>
> That said our CI/build guys have already got gitorious set up (we get
> to it through ssh with ssh keys and one "git" user on the server)
Note that
Michael Campbell:
> So one plan is to have multiple repos, and then a mirror of those for
> the remote devs. The other plan is to say "sod it" and have one local
> and one remote and just suffer through possible non-requirements of
> varying authorization profiles.
You could also use Gerrit[1]. I
In message
, Michael
Campbell writes:
As a business decision we have decided to pull in some "staff
augmentation". We don't want the remote developers to have direct
access. Our plan is to have some sort of external repo on which they
can push things, and locally we can pull t
My company is moving from CVS to git in a few weeks (and we have a
training class scheduled with the github folks).
That said our CI/build guys have already got gitorious set up (we get
to it through ssh with ssh keys and one "git" user on the server) and
we are in the process of migrating all new
4 matches
Mail list logo