> In any case, adding value to the existing process is hard (because it
> works quite well!) and probably requires significantly more work to
> even understand what that value might look like. This, I think, is the
> key reason it is hard to truly get started with any bug tracking
> solution; the s
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:34 AM, wrote:
> OK, thanks for these informations.
> From a user perspective, having this volume of devel mails flooding all the
> bugs mail is very annoying.
> And following the status of a bug and the history of this bug is very hard
> too.
> The bugzilla approach is
[ Please, don't top-post, and set your mailer correctly so that the To:
header points to the person you're replying to. ]
ycollette.nos...@free.fr writes:
> On most linux distro bugzilla website, there are some people dedicated
> to triaging bugs (finding duplicated bugs, asking for more
> info
can read, most people here are very reluctant to use a
bugtracking tool ...
YC
- Mail original -
De: "brian m. carlson"
À: "ycollette nospam"
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 15 Novembre 2013 23:57:09
Objet: Re: Add a bugzilla website
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:40:47AM +0100, ycollette.nos...@free.fr wrote:
> And the conclusion is ? No bugzilla tool installed because somebody
> want to build a gitbased bugzilla thing ?
Personally, I do not want Yet Another Bugzilla Account. A project is
significantly less likely to get a patch
Hi,
Andrew Ardill wrote:
> On 15 November 2013 01:51, Konstantin Khomoutov
> wrote:
>> But there was an announcement that an experimental JIRA instance has
>> been set up for Git [1]. I'm not sure what its current status is, but
>> you could look at it.
>
> So!
>
> The biggest concern has alway
On 15 November 2013 01:51, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
> But there was an announcement that an experimental JIRA instance has
> been set up for Git [1]. I'm not sure what its current status is, but
> you could look at it.
So!
The biggest concern has always been that any bug tracking system need
ycollette.nos...@free.fr writes:
> The bugzilla approach is really useful for the user who is reporting
> bugs: all the bugs are tracked, you can see if a bug has been already
> filled and put some additional informations if necessary.
As a user, the most important thing is that the bug is eventu
voyé: Vendredi 15 Novembre 2013 10:51:32
Objet: Re: Add a bugzilla website
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:40:47 +0100 (CET)
ycollette.nos...@free.fr wrote:
> And the conclusion is ? No bugzilla tool installed because somebody
> want to build a gitbased bugzilla thing ?
Well, no, the real answer is t
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:40:47 +0100 (CET)
ycollette.nos...@free.fr wrote:
> And the conclusion is ? No bugzilla tool installed because somebody
> want to build a gitbased bugzilla thing ?
Well, no, the real answer is that for those who actually write code and
apply patches, an e-mail based workflo
And the conclusion is ? No bugzilla tool installed because somebody want to
build a gitbased bugzilla thing ?
YC
- Mail original -
De: "Damien Wyart"
À: "ycollette nospam"
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 15 Novembre 2013 09:53:26
Objet: Re: Ad
* ycollette.nos...@free.fr [2013-11-15 08:44]:
> I just wanted to ask a question: why is there no bugzilla website for
> git ? It's better to put bugs into such a tool to follow there
> evolution than to manage bugs via a developpment mailing list ...
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-co
Hello,
I just wanted to ask a question: why is there no bugzilla website for git ?
It's better to put bugs into such a tool to follow there evolution than to
manage bugs via a developpment mailing list ...
Best regards,
YC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
