Hi Dscho,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:12 AM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:58 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > Elijah Newren writes:
...
> > > I'd say this is the only practical solution, before you deprecate
> > > the "pipe form
Hi Elijah,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:58 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > Elijah Newren writes:
> >
> > > - Add a flag to turn off directory rename detection, and set the
> > > flag for every call from am.c in order to avoid problems like this.
> >
>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:58 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Elijah Newren writes:
>
> > - Add a flag to turn off directory rename detection, and set the
> > flag for every call from am.c in order to avoid problems like this.
>
> I'd say this is the only practical solution, before you deprecate
>
Elijah Newren writes:
> - Add a flag to turn off directory rename detection, and set the
> flag for every call from am.c in order to avoid problems like this.
I'd say this is the only practical solution, before you deprecate
the "pipe format-patch output to am -3" style of "git rebase" (and
op
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:33 AM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28 2018, Nikolay Kasyanov wrote:
> >
> > > I’ve found something that may be a regression in git rebase
> > > implementation in 2.18.0.
> > > First I spotted it on macOS
Hi,
Yes, it does fix this behavior. Could you please point me to the thread?
Best,
Nikolay
> On 28. Aug 2018, at 15:33, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 28 2018, Nikolay Kasyanov wrote:
>>
>>> I’ve found something
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28 2018, Nikolay Kasyanov wrote:
>
> > I’ve found something that may be a regression in git rebase implementation
> > in 2.18.0.
> > First I spotted it on macOS but I can also confirm it happening on Linux.
> > Git 2.19.0.rc0
On Tue, Aug 28 2018, Nikolay Kasyanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve found something that may be a regression in git rebase implementation in
> 2.18.0.
> First I spotted it on macOS but I can also confirm it happening on Linux.
> Git 2.19.0.rc0.48.gb9dfa238d is affected too.
>
> In order to trigger it,
Hi,
I’ve found something that may be a regression in git rebase implementation in
2.18.0.
First I spotted it on macOS but I can also confirm it happening on Linux.
Git 2.19.0.rc0.48.gb9dfa238d is affected too.
In order to trigger it, a repo layout similar to the following is required:
files/
9 matches
Mail list logo
