Re: [patch] list shortlog items in commit order

2005-08-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > I don't really care either way. I suspect it's mostly the users, not the developers, who care. The core developers already know what went in, and have git to see it, they don't look at the shortlog output. So I suspect it's more important to see if

Re: [patch] list shortlog items in commit order

2005-08-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
Junio C Hamano wrote: Nicolas Pitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The current shortlog list is backward making it look odd. This reverses it so things appear more logically. Sorry, I do not know how the shortlog looked like in BK days, but it would be nice to match that order. I do not have

Re: [patch] list shortlog items in commit order

2005-08-02 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Nicolas Pitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The current shortlog list is backward making it look odd. > > This reverses it so things appear more logically. > > Sorry, I do not know how the shortlog looked like in BK days, > but it would be nice to

Re: [patch] list shortlog items in commit order

2005-08-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Nicolas Pitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The current shortlog list is backward making it look odd. > This reverses it so things appear more logically. Sorry, I do not know how the shortlog looked like in BK days, but it would be nice to match that order. I do not have preference either way my

[patch] list shortlog items in commit order

2005-08-02 Thread Nicolas Pitre
The current shortlog list is backward making it look odd. This reverses it so things appear more logically. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/git-shortlog b/git-shortlog --- a/git-shortlog +++ b/git-shortlog @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ sub shortlog_output { #