Jeff King writes:
> Another difference I found is that "[\d]" matches a literal "\" or "d"
> in ERE, but behaves like "[0-9]" in PCRE. I'll work up a patch based on
> that.
Wow, clever.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:40:00PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > > I'm not sure if musl is wrong for failing to complain about a
> > > bogus regex. Generally making something that would break into
> > > something that works is an OK way to extend the standard. So our
> > > test is at fault for a
* A. Wilcox [2017-01-10 04:36:50 -0600]:
> On 09/01/17 15:33, Jeff King wrote:
> > The problem is that we are expecting the regex "\x{2b}" to complain
> > in regcomp() (as an ERE), but it doesn't. And that probably _is_
> > related to musl, which is providing the libc regex (I know this
> > looks
3 matches
Mail list logo
