Samuel GROOT writes:
> Can we consider this feature obsolete and remove it?
We're usually quite conservative with backward compatibility. If we
remove the feature, we may want to announce it in the next feature
release and actually remove it in the one after (unless we get valid
objection in the
On 05/30/2016 04:20 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Is the "lots of email" format still used?
AFAICT, it was initially supported for backward compatibility, and then
no one removed it, but I wouldn't be surprised if no one actually used
it.
I vaguely remember a message from Ryan Anderson being surpris
Samuel GROOT writes:
> (mbox) prefix was introduced by Ryan Anderson in 2005 (can't find the
> exact commit though), in opposition with the (non-mbox) format ("lots
> of email") that was used before.
That is actually from the original commit introducing send-email:
83b2443 ([PATCH] Add git-send-
On 05/29/2016 08:05 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Samuel GROOT writes:
Should we take what Eric suggested (see below) as standard output?
Since the headers are already shown after those lines, it's
redundant to have the entire line. And we could add
trailers after the headers (with a blank line t
Samuel GROOT writes:
> Should we take what Eric suggested (see below) as standard output?
>
>> Since the headers are already shown after those lines, it's
>> redundant to have the entire line. And we could add
>> trailers after the headers (with a blank line to delimit):
>>
>> # existing hea
On 05/28/2016 05:04 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Eric Wong writes:
Samuel GROOT wrote:
(mbox) Adding cc: A from line 'Cc: A,
One'
(mbox) Adding cc: One from line 'Cc: A,
One'
Though `git send-email` now outputs something like:
(mbox) Adding cc: A from line 'Cc:
A'
(mbox) Addi
Eric Wong writes:
> Samuel GROOT wrote:
>
>>(mbox) Adding cc: A from line 'Cc:
>> A, One'
>>(mbox) Adding cc: One from line 'Cc:
>> A, One'
>>
>> Though `git send-email` now outputs something like:
>>
>>(mbox) Adding cc: A from line 'Cc:
>> A'
>>(mbox) Adding cc: One fro
Samuel GROOT wrote:
> While working on the new option `quote-email`, we needed to parse an
> email file. Since the work is already done, but the parsing and data
> processing are in the same loop, we wanted to refactor the parser, to
> make the code more maintainable.
Thank you for doing this wor
While working on the new option `quote-email`, we needed to parse an
email file. Since the work is already done, but the parsing and data
processing are in the same loop, we wanted to refactor the parser, to
make the code more maintainable.
This is still WIP, and one of the main issue (and we need
9 matches
Mail list logo
