Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 10.04.2015 05:39:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 05:23:17AM +0200, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> Curiously, though, the git-svn tests seem to run fine for me on Apache
>> 2.4 without your patch. I wonder if the fixes I mentioned above (which I
>> definitely needed to get the regul
Michael J Gruber wrote:
> So debian stable has apache 2.2? That explains why many don't see these
> problems.
Right.
> So, before 3/3, t9118 and such do run the web server and test git-svn
> against that for you?
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body
Eric Wong venit, vidit, dixit 08.04.2015 22:26:
> Michael J Gruber wrote:
>> The current config is tailored to apache 2.2. Apache 2.4 fails to start
>> with it.
>>
>> Adjust the config to apache 2.4.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber
>> ---
>
> 1/3 and 2/3 tested fine on Debian stable (wheez
Michael J Gruber wrote:
> The current config is tailored to apache 2.2. Apache 2.4 fails to start
> with it.
>
> Adjust the config to apache 2.4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber
> ---
1/3 and 2/3 tested fine on Debian stable (wheezy).
You can add my Tested-by to 1/3 and my S-o-b to 2/3.
.
The current config is tailored to apache 2.2. Apache 2.4 fails to start
with it.
Adjust the config to apache 2.4.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber
---
Notes:
This is WIP and RFH. Apache does not start without mpm, and the lock
mechanism has changed. It will run with these changes, but sv
5 matches
Mail list logo