Hi Alban
sorry for the slow reply, I think you're probably off-list for a while
by now
On 21/03/2019 21:13, Alban Gruin wrote:
Hi Phillip,
It’s nice to see your work on this on the list.
Le 19/03/2019 à 20:03, Phillip Wood a écrit :
From: Phillip Wood
In order to run `rebase -i` without
Phillip Wood writes:
> Hi Junio
>
> On 21/03/2019 04:21, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Phillip Wood writes:
>>
>>> +static struct replay_opts get_replay_opts(const struct rebase_options
>>> *opts)
>>> +{
>>> + struct replay_opts replay = REPLAY_OPTS_INIT;
>>> +
>>> + sequencer_init_config(&repla
Hi Phillip,
It’s nice to see your work on this on the list.
Le 19/03/2019 à 20:03, Phillip Wood a écrit :
> From: Phillip Wood
>
> In order to run `rebase -i` without forking `rebase--interactive` it
> will be convenient to use the same structure when parsing the options in
> cmd_rebase() and c
Hi Junio
On 21/03/2019 04:21, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Phillip Wood writes:
+static struct replay_opts get_replay_opts(const struct rebase_options *opts)
+{
+ struct replay_opts replay = REPLAY_OPTS_INIT;
+
+ sequencer_init_config(&replay);
+
+ replay.action = REPLAY_INTERACTIV
Phillip Wood writes:
> +static struct replay_opts get_replay_opts(const struct rebase_options *opts)
> +{
> + struct replay_opts replay = REPLAY_OPTS_INIT;
> +
> + sequencer_init_config(&replay);
> +
> + replay.action = REPLAY_INTERACTIVE_REBASE;
> + replay.signoff = opts->signoff
From: Phillip Wood
In order to run `rebase -i` without forking `rebase--interactive` it
will be convenient to use the same structure when parsing the options in
cmd_rebase() and cmd_rebase__interactive().
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood
---
builtin/rebase.c | 203 ++
6 matches
Mail list logo