Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] output improvements for git range-diff

2019-04-15 Thread Thomas Gummerer
On 04/15, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2019, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > > > @@ -99,10 +90,10 @@ modified file Documentation/git-revert.txt > > A better example might be a .c file, as the function name is often a > pretty useful piece of information. Yeah, maybe w

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] output improvements for git range-diff

2019-04-15 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Thomas, On Sun, 14 Apr 2019, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > @@ -99,10 +90,10 @@ modified file Documentation/git-revert.txt A better example might be a .c file, as the function name is often a pretty useful piece of information. Read: I think it should be part of the outer hunk header. Also, t

[RFC PATCH 0/4] output improvements for git range-diff

2019-04-14 Thread Thomas Gummerer
This series aims at improving the output of 'git range-diff', especially in cases like the one mentioned in [*1*], where a diff header, that was before the outer diff's hunk header was misinterpreted as being the filename of the diff that followed it. It does so by substituting the diff header of