Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 09:48:42PM +, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
>> > It looks like GitGitGadget just uses normal SMTP to submit the messages.
>> > I wonder if normal people using gmail as their SMTP server for
>> > send-email also suffer from this. I've not ever noticed it,
On Mon, Mar 18 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:52:54AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King writes:
>>
>> > Hmm. I guess it is still an issue in GGG. This thread has identical
>> > timestamps on patches 1 and 2 (and my server received them out of order
>> > by 2 secon
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 09:48:42PM +, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> > It looks like GitGitGadget just uses normal SMTP to submit the messages.
> > I wonder if normal people using gmail as their SMTP server for
> > send-email also suffer from this. I've not ever noticed it, but I
> > don't know how
On 03/18, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:52:54AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Jeff King writes:
> >
> > > Hmm. I guess it is still an issue in GGG. This thread has identical
> > > timestamps on patches 1 and 2 (and my server received them out of order
> > > by 2 seconds, so
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:52:54AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > Hmm. I guess it is still an issue in GGG. This thread has identical
> > timestamps on patches 1 and 2 (and my server received them out of order
> > by 2 seconds, so mutt orders them wrong):
> >
> > https:
Jeff King writes:
> Hmm. I guess it is still an issue in GGG. This thread has identical
> timestamps on patches 1 and 2 (and my server received them out of order
> by 2 seconds, so mutt orders them wrong):
>
> https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.163.git.gitgitgad...@gmail.com/
>
> I do still thin
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 02:42:42PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Another thing that I always dreamed of having: GitGitGadget could
> automatically warn about commit messages that are incomplete, that
> disagree with our preferred format, that contain typos or offensive
> language.
>
> Likew
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> FWIW I'd love to see it on git/git for discoverability. From the rest of
> your E-Mail it sounds like you're working on that. So just a +1.
>
> If that doesn't work for whatever reason maybe we can amend git.git with
> thi
On Fri, Mar 15 2019, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Peff,
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:04:51PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>> > > One thing that I think submitGit can do that GGG cannot (yet), is just
>> > > take PRs straight on git/git. If
Hi Peff,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:04:51PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > One thing that I think submitGit can do that GGG cannot (yet), is just
> > > take PRs straight on git/git. If we're going to start recommending it,
> > > then I think we'
Hi Peff,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:31:21PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > Hmm. I guess it is still an issue in GGG. This thread has identical
> > > timestamps on patches 1 and 2 (and my server received them out of order
> > > by 2 seconds, so m
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:04:51PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > One thing that I think submitGit can do that GGG cannot (yet), is just
> > take PRs straight on git/git. If we're going to start recommending it,
> > then I think we'd probably want to configure that, since it's one less
> >
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:31:21PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hmm. I guess it is still an issue in GGG. This thread has identical
> > timestamps on patches 1 and 2 (and my server received them out of order
> > by 2 seconds, so mutt orders them wrong):
> >
> > https://public-inbox.org
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:06 PM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> If this is truly something we ("we" as in "engaged Git developers") want,
> I can set aside some time to work on that. I had originally planned on
> exactly that, i.e. supporting PRs on git/git, but I got rather strong
> indications that
Hi Peff,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> One thing that I think submitGit can do that GGG cannot (yet), is just
> take PRs straight on git/git. If we're going to start recommending it,
> then I think we'd probably want to configure that, since it's one less
> confusing step for first-time
Hi Peff,
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 03:39:09PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > > Jeff King writes:
> > >
> > > > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG:
> > >
Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King writes:
>>
>> > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG:
>> >
>> > 1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't
>> > munge timestamps to h
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Jeff King writes:
> >
> > > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG:
> > >
> > > 1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't
>
Hi Roberto,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, Roberto Tyley wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 21:34, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > I feel a little bad sending this, because I really value the work that
> > Roberto has done on submitGit. So just dropping it feels a bit
> > dismissive.
>
> Oh, you're very kind, that'
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 03:39:09PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Jeff King writes:
> >
> > > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG:
> > >
> > > 1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:18:25AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > Jeff King writes:
> >
> >> -Nevertheless, you can use [submitGit](http://submitgit.herokuapp.com/) to
> >> +Nevertheless, you can use [Git Git
> >> Gadget](https://gitgitgadget.github.io/) to
> >
> >
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG:
> >
> > 1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't
> > munge timestamps to help threaded mail readers han
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:08:00PM +, Roberto Tyley wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 21:34, Jeff King wrote:
> ...
> > We could continue to mention _both_ tools, but it's probably better to
> > pick one in order to avoid overwhelming the user with choice. After all,
> > one of the purposes her
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> -Nevertheless, you can use [submitGit](http://submitgit.herokuapp.com/) to
>> +Nevertheless, you can use [Git Git Gadget](https://gitgitgadget.github.io/)
>> to
>
> The pointed-at page calls the tool a single word with three capital
> Gs without S
Jeff King writes:
> -Nevertheless, you can use [submitGit](http://submitgit.herokuapp.com/) to
> +Nevertheless, you can use [Git Git Gadget](https://gitgitgadget.github.io/)
> to
The pointed-at page calls the tool a single word with three capital
Gs without SP in it. We should match it here an
Jeff King writes:
> infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG:
>
> 1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't
> munge timestamps to help threaded mail readers handled out-of-order
> delivery.
Hmph, I had an impression that the recent
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 21:34, Jeff King wrote:
...
> We could continue to mention _both_ tools, but it's probably better to
> pick one in order to avoid overwhelming the user with choice. After all,
> one of the purposes here is to reduce friction for first-time or
> infrequent contributors. And t
In the contributing guide and PR template seen by people who open pull
requests on GitHub, we mention the submitGit tool, which gives an
alternative to figuring out the mailing list. These days we also have
the similar Git Git Gadget tool, and we should make it clear that this
is also an option.
W
28 matches
Mail list logo
