Stefan Beller writes:
> I think so, instead of resending the documentation, maybe the header
> file shows that we're on the same page, I converted everything except
> attr.c to follow this header attr.h:
OK. The function signature of git_check_attr() looks suspect (it
does not match the "typica
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> I thought about that, but as I concluded that the get_all_attrs doesn't need
>> conversion to a threading environment, we can keep it as is.
>
> I agree that it is OK for get_all_attrs() to use its own way to ask
Stefan Beller writes:
> I thought about that, but as I concluded that the get_all_attrs doesn't need
> conversion to a threading environment, we can keep it as is.
I agree that it is OK for get_all_attrs() to use its own way to ask
a question and receive an answer to it, that is different from h
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-gitattributes.txt
>> b/Documentation/technical/api-gitattributes.txt
>> index 92fc32a..940617e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/technical/api-gitattributes.txt
>> +++ b/Docume
Stefan Beller writes:
> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-gitattributes.txt
> b/Documentation/technical/api-gitattributes.txt
> index 92fc32a..940617e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/technical/api-gitattributes.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-gitattributes.txt
> @@ -59,7 +59,10 @@ Qu
This is what we want to see at the end of the refactoring session
to enable the attr subsystem to be thread safe.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
---
Junio wrote:
>> So how would we go about git_all_attrs then?
>
> I think you arrived the same conclusion, but ...
I think the changes as propose
6 matches
Mail list logo
