Re: [PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar

2015-01-21 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Eric Wong wrote: > Adding it to GITPERLLIB should work... I tried everything including replicating the commands in the brew formula that does the Right thing: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/git.rb I'm clearly missing something. Can someone on Darwin tell us the r

Re: [PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar

2015-01-15 Thread Eric Wong
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Eric Wong wrote: > > I haven't seen this before. Which SVN Perl binding version are you > > using? Perhaps your "svnadmin" tool is from a different SVN version > > or installation of SVN than your Perl bindings? > > I have two installations of Subversion: the syste

Re: [PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar

2015-01-15 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Eric Wong wrote: > I haven't seen this before. Which SVN Perl binding version are you > using? Perhaps your "svnadmin" tool is from a different SVN version > or installation of SVN than your Perl bindings? I have two installations of Subversion: the system one is at /Library/Developer/CommandLin

Re: [PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar

2015-01-15 Thread Eric Wong
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > To which a natural reaction was "Can the existing breakage > > demonstrated by a test?". > > There's a lot to do, if we really want to dig deeper. > > The second git-svn-basic test onwards doesn't pass for me, so I really > can't do much in

Re: [PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar

2015-01-15 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Junio C Hamano wrote: > To which a natural reaction was "Can the existing breakage > demonstrated by a test?". There's a lot to do, if we really want to dig deeper. The second git-svn-basic test onwards doesn't pass for me, so I really can't do much in the way of contributing tests until that's f

Re: [PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar

2015-01-15 Thread Junio C Hamano
Eric Wong writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Thanks. No tests necessary/feasible? Just being curious. > > They seemed simple and obvious enough to me, > (and most importantly, didn't trigger regressions). I can see that the top-most one is about .git that is a textual symlink ".gitdir: " and

Re: [PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar

2015-01-15 Thread Eric Wong
Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thanks. No tests necessary/feasible? Just being curious. They seemed simple and obvious enough to me, (and most importantly, didn't trigger regressions). If Ramkumar or anybody else has the time, I'd welcome them. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr

Re: [PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar

2015-01-15 Thread Junio C Hamano
Eric Wong writes: > The following changes since commit 563d4e59bd167fe2eecc5480e3841d878b1c8c2b: > > Fifth batch for 2.3 cycle (2015-01-14 12:44:03 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://bogomips.org/git-svn.git for-junio > > for you to fetch changes up to a94655dcfedc6b

[PULL] git-svn updates from Ramkumar

2015-01-15 Thread Eric Wong
The following changes since commit 563d4e59bd167fe2eecc5480e3841d878b1c8c2b: Fifth batch for 2.3 cycle (2015-01-14 12:44:03 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://bogomips.org/git-svn.git for-junio for you to fetch changes up to a94655dcfedc6b266ba32a3d32b0d52a1ce6a928: git