Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:52:38AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > The one thing that does give me pause is that we do not seem to have any
>> > way of accessing mergetag signatures. We should perhaps stop and think
>> > for a second about how we might expose those (and wh
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:52:38AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > The one thing that does give me pause is that we do not seem to have any
> > way of accessing mergetag signatures. We should perhaps stop and think
> > for a second about how we might expose those (and whether it would fit
> > int
Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:05:46AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
>> This incorporates all remarks about the test coding guidelines and
>> rearranging the series.
>>
>> Open questions:
>> - There was some debate about (optionally) verifying more than what
>> git-verify-{com
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:05:46AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> This incorporates all remarks about the test coding guidelines and
> rearranging the series.
>
> Open questions:
> - There was some debate about (optionally) verifying more than what
> git-verify-{commit,tag} currently do, or goi
This incorporates all remarks about the test coding guidelines and
rearranging the series.
Open questions:
- There was some debate about (optionally) verifying more than what
git-verify-{commit,tag} currently do, or going for a generic git-verify command.
The former would require both to be change
5 matches
Mail list logo
