Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] submodule--helper: Have some refactoring only patches first

2015-08-31 Thread Junio C Hamano
Stefan Beller writes: > One of the mistakes I made last week was mixing these quite stable patches > with highly RFC/WIP patches and not pointing out loud which is which. I think it was very clear which is which to people who have been following (which are the only people you would care about an

[PATCHv2 0/3] submodule--helper: Have some refactoring only patches first

2015-08-31 Thread Stefan Beller
This patch series is the first part of the larger series I sent daily last week and contains only those patches which have had good review by Jeff, Dscho and Junio doing only internal refactoring, not introducing any parallelism yet. It replaces all patches on top of (5a1ba6b48a62b, Merge 'hv/submo