On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:11:34AM +0200, Harald Nordgren wrote:
> Without digging to much into the `ref-filter` code itself, it seems
> like there is an opportunity to generalize and unfify the logic
> between these two cases. As well as using `ALLOC_GROW`. But maybe that
> is best left as a foll
Without digging to much into the `ref-filter` code itself, it seems
like there is an opportunity to generalize and unfify the logic
between these two cases. As well as using `ALLOC_GROW`. But maybe that
is best left as a follow-up task? Especially since this patch focuses
on `ls-remote`. Seems poss
Create a '--sort' option for ls-remote, based on the one from
for-each-ref. This e.g. allows ref names to be sorted by version
semantics, so that v1.2 is sorted before v1.10.
Signed-off-by: Harald Nordgren
---
Notes:
Partial fixes from Jeff King's comments
Documentation/git-ls-remote.txt |
3 matches
Mail list logo
