On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 06:40:23AM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > Unlike the depth, I don't think there's any _inherent_ reason you
> > couldn't throw, say, 1MB deltas into the cache (if you sized it large
> > enough). But I doubt such deltas are really all that common. Here are
> > the top 10 in li
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:59 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 07:33:48AM +0100, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
>> We only cache deltas when it's smaller than a certain limit. This limit
>> defaults to 1000 but save its compressed length in a 64-bit field.
>> Shrink that field down to
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 07:33:48AM +0100, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> We only cache deltas when it's smaller than a certain limit. This limit
> defaults to 1000 but save its compressed length in a 64-bit field.
> Shrink that field down to 16 bits, so you can only cache 65kb deltas.
> Larger delt
We only cache deltas when it's smaller than a certain limit. This limit
defaults to 1000 but save its compressed length in a 64-bit field.
Shrink that field down to 16 bits, so you can only cache 65kb deltas.
Larger deltas must be recomputed at when the pack is written down.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn
4 matches
Mail list logo
