On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 23:42 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 2014-06-05 21.26, David Turner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 14:30 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> >> On 2014-06-04 23.16, David Turner wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sure! I actually went with > 120k to make measurement easier:
> >>>
On 2014-06-05 21.26, David Turner wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 14:30 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>> On 2014-06-04 23.16, David Turner wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure! I actually went with > 120k to make measurement easier:
>>> https://github.com/dturner-tw/many-refs
>> Hm, I didn't get so man
>>
>> g
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 14:46 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 10:04 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> > [snip discussion of compiler flags; I'll look into a cpuid approach]
>
> H, I am not sure if the complexity is really worth it.
>
> In any
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 14:30 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 2014-06-04 23.16, David Turner wrote:
> >
> > Sure! I actually went with > 120k to make measurement easier:
> > https://github.com/dturner-tw/many-refs
> Hm, I didn't get so man
>
> git remote -v
> origin https://github.com/dtu
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:30:17PM +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 2014-06-04 23.16, David Turner wrote:
> >
> > Sure! I actually went with > 120k to make measurement easier:
> > https://github.com/dturner-tw/many-refs
> Hm, I didn't get so man
>
> git remote -v
> origin https://github.
On 2014-06-04 23.16, David Turner wrote:
>
> Sure! I actually went with > 120k to make measurement easier:
> https://github.com/dturner-tw/many-refs
Hm, I didn't get so man
git remote -v
origin https://github.com/dturner-tw/many-refs
wc .git/packed-refs
7501130 38868 .git/packed-
David Turner writes:
> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 10:04 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> [snip discussion of compiler flags; I'll look into a cpuid approach]
H, I am not sure if the complexity is really worth it.
In any case, [PATCH 1/2] is fairly uncontroversial, so I am inclined
to queue i
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 16:25 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On the other hand, looking here:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2009-10/msg00063.html
> and looking into refs.c,
> it seems as if we can try to run
> strcspn(refname, bad_characters)
> and
> strstr(refname, "@{"
> and
> str
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 10:04 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
[snip discussion of compiler flags; I'll look into a cpuid approach]
> > --- a/git-compat-util.h
> > +++ b/git-compat-util.h
> > @@ -668,6 +668,28 @@ void git_qsort(void *base, size_t nmemb, size_t size,
> > #endif
> > #endif
> >
>
On 2014-06-04 13.21, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-06-04 05.38, David Turner wrote:
>> []
>>> []
>>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>>> index a53f3a8..dd2127a 100644
>>> --- a/Makefile
>>> +++ b/Makefile
>>> @@ -1326,6 +1326,11 @@ e
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>
> On 2014-06-04 05.38, David Turner wrote:
> []
>> []
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> index a53f3a8..dd2127a 100644
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -1326,6 +1326,11 @@ else
>> COMPAT_OBJS += compat/win32mm
On 2014-06-04 05.38, David Turner wrote:
[]
> []
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index a53f3a8..dd2127a 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1326,6 +1326,11 @@ else
> COMPAT_OBJS += compat/win32mmap.o
> endif
> endif
> +ifdef NO_SSE42
> + BASIC_CFLAGS += -DN
Optimize check_refname_component using SSE4.2, where available.
git rev-parse HEAD is a good test-case for this, since it does almost
nothing except parse refs. For one particular repo with about 60k
refs, almost all packed, the timings are:
Look up table: 29 ms
SSE4.2:25 ms
This is abo
13 matches
Mail list logo
