Derrick Stolee writes:
> Instead of "we must stay dumb" I wanted to say "we are not dumber (in
> this case)".
Thanks, then what we aim for are compatible ;-) I do agree that we
should make sure we will not ever become overly stupid.
> To properly test "these objects are included," do we have a
On 1/11/2019 5:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes:
From: Derrick Stolee
Add a '--sparse' option flag to the pack-objects builtin. This
allows the user to specify that they want to use the new logic
for walking trees. This logic currently does not differ fro
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes:
> From: Derrick Stolee
>
> Add a '--sparse' option flag to the pack-objects builtin. This
> allows the user to specify that they want to use the new logic
> for walking trees. This logic currently does not differ from the
> existing output, but will in a
From: Derrick Stolee
Add a '--sparse' option flag to the pack-objects builtin. This
allows the user to specify that they want to use the new logic
for walking trees. This logic currently does not differ from the
existing output, but will in a later change.
Create a new test script, t5322-pack-ob
4 matches
Mail list logo
