On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>> How to store stuff in .git is the implementation details that the user
>>> does not care about.
>>
>> They do unfortunately. :(
>
> Well.. i mean the structure of .git. If .git gets big,
Jakub wrote:
> I think the problem with `--reference` is that it does not
> setup backreferences to prevent gc removing borrowed objects;
> which is a hard problem to solve, except for limited cases...
> like git-worktree.
Right. And instead of solving the reference problem, I'd
rather solve the w
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> How to store stuff in .git is the implementation details that the user
>> does not care about.
>
> They do unfortunately. :(
Well.. i mean the structure of .git. If .git gets big, yeah many
people will get pissed.
> My sudden interest in w
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Max Kirillov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 07:24:18PM +0200, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> + - `remote.*` added by submodules may be per working directory as
>> + well, unless you are sure remotes from all possible submodules in
>> + history are con
W dniu 2016-07-27 o 06:10, Max Kirillov pisze:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 07:24:18PM +0200, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> + - `remote.*` added by submodules may be per working directory as
>> + well, unless you are sure remotes from all possible submodules in
>> + history are consisten
W dniu 2016-07-26 o 20:15, Stefan Beller pisze:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>> So what is the design philosophy in worktrees? How much independence does
>>> one working tree have?
>>
>> git-worktree started out as
Hi.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 07:24:18PM +0200, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> + - `remote.*` added by submodules may be per working directory as
> + well, unless you are sure remotes from all possible submodules in
> + history are consistent.
...
> @@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ cmd_sync()
>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> So what is the design philosophy in worktrees? How much independence does
>> one working tree have?
>
> git-worktree started out as an alternative for git-stash: hmm.. i need
> to make s
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> So what is the design philosophy in worktrees? How much independence does
> one working tree have?
git-worktree started out as an alternative for git-stash: hmm.. i need
to make some changes in another branch, okay let's leave this worktree
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>> I just quickly glanced through the rest of this mail because, as a
>>> submodule ignorant, it's just mumbo jumbo to me. But w
Stefan Beller writes:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> * submodule.$name.update, submodule.$name.ignore,
>>submodule.$name.branch, etc. would need to be all different among
>>worktrees of the superproject, as that is the whole point of
>>being able to w
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> I just quickly glanced through the rest of this mail because, as a
>> submodule ignorant, it's just mumbo jumbo to me. But what I see here
>> is, there may be problems if we choose to
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> From a users POV there are:
>> * non existent submodules (no gitlink recorded, no config set,
>> no repo in place)
>> * not initialized submodules (gitlink is recorded, no config set,
>> and an empty repo is p
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> I just quickly glanced through the rest of this mail because, as a
> submodule ignorant, it's just mumbo jumbo to me. But what I see here
> is, there may be problems if we choose to share some submodule info,
> but I haven't seen any good thi
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>> ---
>> Documentation/git-worktree.txt | 8
>> git-submodule.sh | 8
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions
Stefan Beller writes:
> From a users POV there are:
> * non existent submodules (no gitlink recorded, no config set,
> no repo in place)
> * not initialized submodules (gitlink is recorded, no config set,
> and an empty repo is put in the working tree as a place holder).
This is no different
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Am 21.07.2016 um 01:22 schrieb Stefan Beller:
>>
>> So maybe we want to drop that series and first talk about a migration plan
>> from
>> the current state to a world where we have the existence depending not
>> on the url
>> parameter, but a
Am 21.07.2016 um 01:22 schrieb Stefan Beller:
So maybe we want to drop that series and first talk about a migration plan from
the current state to a world where we have the existence depending not
on the url
parameter, but a boolean variable submodule...
Depending on a submodule would be ignored
FYI: I started working on a series that decouples existence of a
submodule from the URL
as a preparatory series to this one. Then we can have the same URL in
all working trees, but
the existence is configured differently for each working tree.
I'll try to send it out tomorrow.
Thanks,
Stefan
--
T
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> ---
> Documentation/git-worktree.txt | 8
> git-submodule.sh | 8
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-worktree.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
Documentation/git-worktree.txt | 8
git-submodule.sh | 8
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-worktree.txt b/Documentation/git-worktree.txt
index 41350db..2a5661d 100644
--- a/Doc
21 matches
Mail list logo
