Ramsay Jones writes:
> On 13/12/17 01:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> We may probably want to redirect the output of underlying grep to
>> /dev/null in test_i18ngrep to make this kind of misuse easier to
>> spot.
>
> I have test-suite failures on the 'pu' branch for t4151-am-abort.sh
> (#3 and #6)
On 13/12/17 01:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Elijah Newren writes:
>
>> This patchset introduces directory rename detection to merge-recursive.
>
> The use of negated form of test_i18ngrep in these patches are all
> wrong. Because the helper must say "even though the string does not
> match (do
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> OK, it seems that I managed to make this test pass under poison build
> (see https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/315658242)
>
> Please check
> https://github.com/git/git/commit/e5c5e24ad91a75b5a70c056fe6c6e3bfb55b56fc
> and sprinkle its fix
OK, it seems that I managed to make this test pass under poison build
(see https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/315658242)
Please check
https://github.com/git/git/commit/e5c5e24ad91a75b5a70c056fe6c6e3bfb55b56fc
and sprinkle its fix to whichever original commits in the series that
need fixing.
Than
Elijah Newren writes:
> This patchset introduces directory rename detection to merge-recursive.
The use of negated form of test_i18ngrep in these patches are all
wrong. Because the helper must say "even though the string does not
match (does match), the test expects it to match (does not match)
This patchset introduces directory rename detection to merge-recursive. See
https://public-inbox.org/git/20171110190550.27059-1-new...@gmail.com/
for the first series (including design considerations, etc.), and follow-up
series can be found at
https://public-inbox.org/git/20171120220209.15111
6 matches
Mail list logo
