On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> ... After all, this is in the contrib area,
>> so if there's a time for a possible future maintainer of a core part
>> of git to make mistakes, it would be now.
>
> That sounds reasonable.
>
> Incidentally, bef
Felipe Contreras writes:
> ... After all, this is in the contrib area,
> so if there's a time for a possible future maintainer of a core part
> of git to make mistakes, it would be now.
That sounds reasonable.
Incidentally, before I had to stop working in order to respond to
your endless argume
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> The reason for the "only regression" period is to avoid more
>> regressions. If you show me how any of the fixes I sent in this series
>> could potentially cause a regression,
>
> I already said that "You can s
Felipe Contreras writes:
> The reason for the "only regression" period is to avoid more
> regressions. If you show me how any of the fixes I sent in this series
> could potentially cause a regression,
I already said that "You can see these patches are so trivially
correct" is not a valid argumen
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>>>
Without this fix, the user would never ever see new bookmarks, only the
ones
that (s)he initially cloned
Felipe Contreras writes:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>>
>>> Without this fix, the user would never ever see new bookmarks, only the ones
>>> that (s)he initially cloned.
>>
>> Now, think again and realize how long it took you (the origina
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> Without this fix, the user would never ever see new bookmarks, only the ones
>> that (s)he initially cloned.
>
> Now, think again and realize how long it took you (the original
> author) to discover issues and
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Without this fix, the user would never ever see new bookmarks, only the ones
> that (s)he initially cloned.
Now, think again and realize how long it took you (the original
author) to discover issues and come up with these fixes and
explanation since the series was merg
Without this fix, the user would never ever see new bookmarks, only the ones
that (s)he initially cloned.
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
> ---
> contrib/remote-helpers/git-remote-hg | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/remote-helpers/git
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
---
contrib/remote-helpers/git-remote-hg | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/contrib/remote-helpers/git-remote-hg
b/contrib/remote-helpers/git-remote-hg
index beb864b..dc276af 100755
--- a/contrib/remote-helpers/git-remote-hg
+++ b/contrib/remot
10 matches
Mail list logo
