Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin am

2016-07-19 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > I do not need cc/apply-am at all, it turns out, but my patch series has a > minor conflict with 'jc/renormalize-merge-kill-safer-crlf'. > > Since you indicated that you want to cook that branch a bit in 'next' > first, I will rebase to master+bc/cocci+js/am-call-thei

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin am

2016-07-19 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Junio, On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > > You can assume that I'll merge bc/cocci and > > js/am-call-theirs-theirs-in-fallback-3way to 'master' during that time, > > so an appropriate base to use

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin am

2016-07-19 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Junio, On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > >> The two topics that are in 'pu' and conflict with this series are > >> 'jh/clean-smudge-annex' and 'bc/cocci'. > >> > >> It also conflicted with 'va/i18n-even-more', but tha

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin am

2016-07-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > >> The two topics that are in 'pu' and conflict with this series are >> 'jh/clean-smudge-annex' and 'bc/cocci'. >> >> It also conflicted with 'va/i18n-even-more', but that one was merged to >> 'master'. >> >> Now, I think it would be okay to

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin am

2016-07-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > The two topics that are in 'pu' and conflict with this series are > 'jh/clean-smudge-annex' and 'bc/cocci'. > > It also conflicted with 'va/i18n-even-more', but that one was merged to > 'master'. > > Now, I think it would be okay to wait for 'bc/cocci' to go to 'mast

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin am

2016-07-14 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Junio, On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > This is the second iteration of the long-awaited re-roll of the attempt to > > avoid spawning merge-recursive from the builtin am and use merge_recursive() > > directly instead. > > This is actually the th

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin am

2016-07-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > This is the second iteration of the long-awaited re-roll of the attempt to > avoid spawning merge-recursive from the builtin am and use merge_recursive() > directly instead. This is actually the third iteration. I am trying to tease dependencies apart and apply thi

[PATCH v3 00/16] Use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin am

2016-07-07 Thread Johannes Schindelin
This is the second iteration of the long-awaited re-roll of the attempt to avoid spawning merge-recursive from the builtin am and use merge_recursive() directly instead. The *real* reason for the reroll is that I need a libified recursive merge to accelerate the interactive rebase by teaching the