On 5/6/2019 4:27 AM, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:44 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> wrote:
>> 1) We can stat() the "commit-graphs" directory to see if there's any
>>new/deleted ones (dir mtime changed), similar to what we do for the
>>untracked cache, and can (but I do
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:44 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 03 2019, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>
> > On 5/2/2019 2:02 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> >>
> >> But those are separate from any back-compat concerns, which is what I
> >> think makes sense to focus on now.
> >
> > T
On 5/3/2019 10:16 AM, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 08:47:25AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>> It would be much simpler to restrict the model. Your idea of changing
>> the file name is the inspiration here.
>>
>> * The "commit-graph" file is the base commit graph. It is always
>>
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 08:47:25AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> It would be much simpler to restrict the model. Your idea of changing
> the file name is the inspiration here.
>
> * The "commit-graph" file is the base commit graph. It is always
> closed under reachability (if a commit exists in
On Fri, May 03 2019, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> On 5/2/2019 2:02 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>
>> But those are separate from any back-compat concerns, which is what I
>> think makes sense to focus on now.
>
> Thinking more on this topic, I think I have a way to satisfy _all_ of
> your conc
On 5/2/2019 2:02 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> But those are separate from any back-compat concerns, which is what I
> think makes sense to focus on now.
Thinking more on this topic, I think I have a way to satisfy _all_ of
your concerns by simplifying the plan for incremental commit-grap
On Thu, May 02 2019, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> On 5/1/2019 4:25 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> I won't repeat my outstanding v2 feedback about v1 & v2
>> incompatibilities, except to say that I'd in principle be fine with
>> having a v2 format the way this series is adding it. I.e. saying "
On 5/1/2019 4:25 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> I won't repeat my outstanding v2 feedback about v1 & v2
> incompatibilities, except to say that I'd in principle be fine with
> having a v2 format the way this series is adding it. I.e. saying "here
> it is, it's never written by default, we'll
On Wed, May 01 2019, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> The commit-graph file format has some shortcomings that were discussed
> on-list:
>
> 1. It doesn't use the 4-byte format ID from the_hash_algo.
>
> 2. There is no way to change the reachability index from generation numbers
> t
The commit-graph file format has some shortcomings that were discussed
on-list:
1. It doesn't use the 4-byte format ID from the_hash_algo.
2. There is no way to change the reachability index from generation numbers
to corrected commit date [1].
3. The unused byte in the
10 matches
Mail list logo