On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 07:26:19PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> > But it is really "make sure that a failed test here does not prevent us
> > from doing this cleanup". So the original really should have just
> > dropped that comment and added a test_when_finished. Bumping it into a
> > separate te
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 4:57 PM Jeff King wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 02:56:47PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>
> > +# Requires one argument: the name of a file containing the expected
> > stripped
> > +# access log entries.
> > +check_access_log() {
> > + sort "$1" >"$1".sorted &&
> > +
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 02:56:47PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> +# Requires one argument: the name of a file containing the expected stripped
> +# access log entries.
> +check_access_log() {
> + sort "$1" >"$1".sorted &&
> + strip_access_log >access.log.stripped &&
> + sort access.log.
The last test of 't5561-http-backend.sh', 'server request log matches
test results' may fail occasionally, because the order of entries in
Apache's access log doesn't match the order of requests sent in the
previous tests, although all the right requests are there. I saw it
fail on Travis CI five
4 matches
Mail list logo