On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 08:28:24AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:21 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:48:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> John Keeping writes:
> >>
> >> > This allows us to replace the submodule path trailing slash removal in
> >>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:21 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:48:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> John Keeping writes:
>>
>> > This allows us to replace the submodule path trailing slash removal in
>> > builtin/rm.c with the PATHSPEC_STRIP_SUBMODULE_SLASH_CHEAP flag to
>>
John Keeping writes:
> This allows us to replace the submodule path trailing slash removal in
> builtin/rm.c with the PATHSPEC_STRIP_SUBMODULE_SLASH_CHEAP flag to
> parse_pathspec() without changing the behaviour with respect to multiple
> trailing slashes.
Where does prefix_pathspec()'s input,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:48:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping writes:
>
> > This allows us to replace the submodule path trailing slash removal in
> > builtin/rm.c with the PATHSPEC_STRIP_SUBMODULE_SLASH_CHEAP flag to
> > parse_pathspec() without changing the behaviour with respe
This allows us to replace the submodule path trailing slash removal in
builtin/rm.c with the PATHSPEC_STRIP_SUBMODULE_SLASH_CHEAP flag to
parse_pathspec() without changing the behaviour with respect to multiple
trailing slashes.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping
---
pathspec.c | 27 +--
5 matches
Mail list logo