Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] worktree.c: add find_worktree_by_path()

2016-05-30 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy > wrote: >> So far we haven't needed to identify an existing worktree from command >> line. Future commands such as lock or move will need it. There are of >> course other options for i

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] worktree.c: add find_worktree_by_path()

2016-05-22 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > So far we haven't needed to identify an existing worktree from command > line. Future commands such as lock or move will need it. There are of > course other options for identifying a worktree, for example by branch > or even by intern

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] worktree.c: add find_worktree_by_path()

2016-05-22 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > So far we haven't needed to identify an existing worktree from command > line. Future commands such as lock or move will need it. There are of > course other options for identifying a worktree, for example by branch > or even by intern

[PATCH v2 1/5] worktree.c: add find_worktree_by_path()

2016-05-22 Thread Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
So far we haven't needed to identify an existing worktree from command line. Future commands such as lock or move will need it. There are of course other options for identifying a worktree, for example by branch or even by internal id. They may be added later if proved useful. Helped-by: Eric Suns