Duy Nguyen writes:
>> My function is a modified version of check_describe().
>
> Whoa. That function is 12 years old! I think our style has evolved a
> bit since then.
;-).
> I mean chaining within a test. This is to make sure any failure
> triggers the test failure (as it should, if some comma
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 08:13:51AM +0100, Sebastian Staudt wrote:
> Am So., 27. Jan. 2019 um 01:07 Uhr schrieb Duy Nguyen :
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 3:51 AM Sebastian Staudt wrote:
> > >
> > > The dirty ones are already passing, but just because describe is comparing
> > > with the wrong wo
Am So., 27. Jan. 2019 um 01:07 Uhr schrieb Duy Nguyen :
>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 3:51 AM Sebastian Staudt wrote:
> >
> > The dirty ones are already passing, but just because describe is comparing
> > with the wrong working tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Staudt
> > ---
> > t/t6120-desc
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 3:51 AM Sebastian Staudt wrote:
>
> The dirty ones are already passing, but just because describe is comparing
> with the wrong working tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Staudt
> ---
> t/t6120-describe.sh | 24
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
The dirty ones are already passing, but just because describe is comparing
with the wrong working tree.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Staudt
---
t/t6120-describe.sh | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t6120-describe.sh b/t/t6120-describe.sh
index d639d94696
5 matches
Mail list logo